This is the exact note that had me pacing around the house
yesterday, unable to put any words to the page:
“The writing is wonderful. When you write as well as you do,
the issue becomes not the writing and its technical workings but what you
choose to write.”
The note was one of many (the closing paragraph of a full
page of text) from my writing teacher in response to my third submission—and
first of fiction—to her class, and I wasn’t overlooking the rest, I’d just
found them simpler to address. She’d written this particular declaration in the
context of pushing me to open up my character’s feeling, to share more of her
interior self. She’d made the same comment on both my memoir submissions, so I
had accepted that I clearly have some walls up that I have to bring down if I
have any chance of writing something emotionally compelling to anyone else. Over
the past few days, I hadn’t had any trouble peppering my story with emotional
descriptions as I’d been asked. But as I reviewed the various notes from classmates
and my teacher on the novella pages I’ve been revising this week, I kept
getting stuck on the tail end of that note. What
you choose to write.
This, I remember, is why I switched to writing nonfiction in
the first place. In my view, nonfiction is really about craft. There’s no
futzing with the plot—you have to stick to the facts of what’s really happened,
or at least what you know of them—so the artfulness lies in the rest, in the shaping
of something like a hunk of clay into a vase, or a saucer, or a sculptural work.
But maybe switching to nonfiction had been the cheater’s way out. Maybe I’d
been in this very spot with this same work of fiction before and ducked out.
The challenge with the story I’m writing is that it’s always
been one part fiction, two parts truth. Write
what you know is the first rule of writing, and sometimes I’m mystified by
how authors write entire books that aren’t about anything from their own life.
Maybe it’s because in writer years I’m still relatively young; maybe I don’t
have enough wisdom accumulated yet to know how to depict something I haven’t
seen or known for myself. But it is a
sense of having gained some wisdom that’s gotten me into this fiction-writing
mindset in the first place. In reality, right now I’m hoping to tell the same
story in two ways—a novel and a memoir—where the former lets me be playful,
pushes my creativity, builds up my art and the latter uses my craft to express
who I am myself. Both require wisdom, an understanding of the deeper meanings
of things that happen in life. Both require keen attention to the technical
refinements of writing. Only the former requires me to choose—from endless
possible plots—every inch of what I write.
The trick, for me, in writing autobiographically inspired
fiction is which plot to shape. Though I started this particular piece ten or
so years ago on the spur of a moment, taking a strongly felt emotion and
putting it into a character’s life in one vivid scene and then feeling out
where that took me, I picked it up again to rewrite because I felt that over
the past decade I’d learned a thing or two and could make the story say more, mean more. What was once an
adventure tale could become a work of strength and insight. I’d taken the first
step toward choosing something meaningful to write: I’d settled on a point to
make.
Except that I’m really still living the thing the story is
about. When, a few years ago, I decided to pick this story back up, I thought I
could conquer it from a place of clarity because the real-life narrative from
which the first scene unfolded had long ago come to an end and, with it, I had come
to some clear conclusions about love, life, and self-care. But in deciding to
adapt the story to my more recent understandings of the world, I have to bring
in new content—those daunting new plot choices—and because right now the
content of my personal life is muddled, as I struggle to figure out just what
life I want to be living, my insights are changing—or at least fogging up for a
bit. That leaves me (about eighty pages in) confused about what I really have to
say with this story and at a total loss for how the plot of the story should
unfold next. No wonder that the suggestion that my craft doesn’t compare to my
art just yet caused me some stress.
Thankfully, having that craft plus this extended period of
time to work it into art means I still have a shot at producing something
satisfying with this story. And if that’s not what I end up doing, I woke up
this morning thinking, so be it; I can always work this struggle into my
memoir. :)
3 comments:
Wow. I hope Karen reads this!
I think that knowing that I'm working through my early-life crisis in her writing class might cause Karen to censor her comments, which I definitely don't want! They're super helpful!!
Something I find in my own writing: the closer my fiction is to truth, the more I'm tempted to wrap things up neatly, draw them to some sort of reasonable conclusion, or at least let the main character learn something or improve her self or her life in some way. After all, I'd like my own life to make sense! (Although... would I really? Ah well. Another topic for another day).
But. I think that urge to neaten things up, to draw conclusions, makes the writing less convincing, the emotion less powerful, the story less true in a larger, non-event-based sense, because that's not the way things _are_.
Somehow this urge to neaten doesn't seem to come up if either the plot is clearly unreal, or the writing is absolutely nonfiction. If what happens if far from reality, I have no compulsion to tie things up with a bow; and if I'm writing based on something that really happened, then it's (relatively) easy to select the elements I find most compelling and I don't need to pull them together (or at least I can more easily resist the inclination).
Of course, I don't know if the same thing is true for you. But if it is, well, maybe this is a new way of thinking about it at least :)
Post a Comment